Apr 29Liked by Douglas Farrow

Thank you for this, and, just to let you know, I used this article in a thread of comments in the online version of my local newspaper: https://lethbridgeherald.com/commentary/letters-to-the-editor/2024/04/27/canadian-press-story-on-ivermectin-shows-ignorance-or-bias/. I don’t think my comment will have much reach, but I made it anyway. I won’t reiterate the entire thread, but here’s my comment:

Thank you Sophie for this reference to a fact checking site that assesses https://c19ivm.org/. I will add it to my tracking of claims and counter-claims surrounding the Covid-19 vaccination issue.

According to the link you provide, “The CovidAnalysis Network [i.e. https://c19ivm.org/] promotes misinformation regarding alternative treatments for Covid-19 by cherry-picking and misrepresenting studies with favorable outcomes. In this way, they are promoting anti-vaccination propaganda without stating it for unknown reasons.”

I do not endorse this assessment, but I do agree that the promotion of ivermectin as a possible treatment for Covid is one strand in a string of attempts to warn the public about the dangers of the Covid-19 vaccines.

In an attempt to sort out what is true from false in the massive welter of claims and counter-claims surrounding Covid-19 vaccines I have gathered literally thousands of links and arguments. There is a very consistent pattern in this data. Those who favour the mRNA vaccines refuse to engage with those who call them into question. They treat the questioners with contempt. In contrast, those who call the vaccines into question beg to be heard and to be engaged with.

Just this morning I was reading yet another article about one of those questioners, Dr. Patrick Provost. Chances are, unless you go looking for this type of material, you’ve never heard of him, but here’s the article: https://douglasfarrow.substack.com/p/dissent-equals-iniquity. It illustrates the pattern I just mentioned. Here are a few excerpts from a letter that Provost wrote to his colleagues:

“Trained as a biochemist, my research work has led me to develop expertise in RNA (over the last 20 years) and lipid nanoparticles (over the last 10 years), which are the two active ingredients in these new ‘vaccines’. I am therefore in a position to understand and explain the concepts behind how these ‘vaccines’ work and, above all, to appreciate the risks they pose to human health. …

“Being aware of the potential risks, known and unknown, associated with these new”vaccines”, I could not remain silent on such important issues, where lives were at stake, particularly those of children. So I decided to go public with my deep and legitimate concerns, which have evolved over time and are based on recognised concepts, solid scientific evidence and reasoning. The main purpose of my statements was to inform and alert the public, my colleagues, my superiors, government experts, doctors and those elected to represent us in the Quebec National Assembly. In a factual, analytical, thoughtful, well-sourced and respectful manner, but insistent (in the absence of a response), I appealed to my interlocutors to reason, prudence, transparency, collaboration, dialogue (or contradictory debates) and respect for the precautionary principle, the rules of ethics, oaths (e.g. the Hippocratic Oath) and medical codes of ethics (e.g. the Nuremberg Code), always with the avowed aim of wanting to ‘ensure the protection of the public’. …

“Throughout my 35-year career in research, I have been in competition with my peers and I have worked hard to eventually make my mark as a professor and remain competitive in research. I have constantly been challenged, confronted, questioned, criticised and called upon to debate my work, my ideas and my opinions by my peers. Why haven’t I been so in the last year or two, when I’ve made so many public appearances? Why have peers disappeared from adversarial public debate?”

My guess, Sophie, is that you have accepted what the medical establishment has been saying and that, as a good citizen, you want to protect the public from misinformation. However, it appears to me that you have not done a lot of investigation of what the dissenters have to say. The fact that you said in your initial response to Dave’s letter that there were no clinical trials supporting ivermectin as a treatment for Covid-19 indicates that you were unaware of them. I could have referenced several other sources that support ivermectin, but I thought that that one would be enough.

I do not fault you for not knowing about these clinical trials. You, and the public in general, has been shielded from a great deal of information on the grounds that the average person will not be able to make sense of a genuine scientific debate. It is feared that the public will draw the wrong conclusions from stories of harm done by the vaccines, so the mainstream media refuses to publish such stories.

For example, you may not have heard about the story about Carrie Sakamoto, a woman from the Lethbridge area who was grievously injured by the vaccines: https://thecanadianindependent.substack.com/p/watch-a-young-alberta-woman-who-suffered. She is pursuing a lawsuit against the provincial and federal governments alleging deceptive practices in promoting the vaccines. Included in the lawsuit are charges that the CBC would not carry her story. If you want the details, here is the statement of claim: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Eohi6U-x5n0cx9zBOwy35PmoZ-VotnlN/view.

There are thousands of stories like Carrie’s which are being hidden from the public. Maybe in the beginning, when the stories of adverse events first arose, there was a plausible case to be made for suppressing them so as not to encourage vaccine hesitancy. But now, as I see it, we have a situation in which mass illusion prevails, a situation in which many people recoil in horror when they get a glimmer of what the real truth of it is. The harms will continue to be perpetrated until more of us begin to face up to this horror.

Expand full comment

Many of us know such stories, or know personally cases of injury or death. Those who refuse to look reality in the face, preferring to take comfort in lies and obfuscations, are only ensuring that all this will happen again and that divisions in families and among neighbours will deepen and our country's future darken. Thank you for what you are doing, with evident patience, to encourage people to take the better course.

Expand full comment

‘Are we witnessing the re-engineering of society?...’

Yes, we are.

Or it would be re-engineering, if they could actually construct or engineer anything. Of course their attempts will only result in chaos.

‘Why are professors who are incapable of engaging in dialogue or debate in a collegial spirit not summoned to explain themselves? Why do these professors remain employed by the university?’

That would be because they are not bright enough to engage in dialogue, and they know it. Diversity hires, perhaps? Meritocracy long eroded away

‘There may be reason to wonder about possible conflicts of interest…’

What very good questions these are, and how beautifully put by Professor Provost. I am so sorry about the relentless, unreasonable and abusive behaviour… best wishes to him, and I am so sorry about all these once fine universities trashing themselves

I see the sly, dry Farrow humour is still there. And thank God for Substack. Keep on trucking you Canadians.

Expand full comment

How does this keep happening? First Dr. Byram Bridle, now Dr. Provost. Years ago a U of Toronto professor of dentistry, Dr. Hardy Limeback, and a world leader in research on fluorosis of teeth and bone, started telling the truth about the systemic developmental toxicity caused by artificial water fluoridation. They did the same things to him. Destroyed his career, nearly destroyed his private dental practice, took away his current research projects, and a former best friend and colleague turned against him with vicious lies, attempted to de-license him but failed, and U of T made sure he never published again.

Expand full comment

It is an old story, I'm afraid, that will keep being re-lived and re-told. But why are so many so tolerant of it? When we are tolerant, we are the ones most to blame. I first met Patrick Provost, by the way, in this context: https://rsqar.net/. Professor Forte, who now writes on Substack at Disaster X, provided leadership—another courageous man with integrity.

Expand full comment

It is becoming increasingly clear we do not live in a free society.

Expand full comment

It’s sad to watch, in real time, the death of scientific inquiry. It sounds like they fired him for his stubborn commitment to truth—they don’t want anybody else getting any ideas.

It will take a long time for this to all shake out, but the truth will out. I’m so grateful to Dr. Provost, and terribly sorry he’s being dragged through the pit. Laval beclowns itself.

Expand full comment

I am amazed and impressed by our colleague's fortitude. The sad reality is that Quebec does not deserve him and, in turn, he does not deserve Quebec. This is now a complete totalitarian biofascist state. Will students protest? Of course not: they are fixated on something called "Palestine" in some faraway place called "Gaza"--they have more pressing duties such as making TikTok videos of their imitation, American-derived encampments. All of this is tragedy, and I can only see one way out: Canadians will have to be broken to begin to learn any lessons, and by then it will be too late. God forgive them, because I cannot and will not.

Expand full comment

Sounds a lot like the way Dr. Byram Bridle at the University of Guelph has been and still is treated. Dr. Bridle has not been allowed into his lab for more than 1000 days.


Expand full comment

Why allow anonymous denunciations?

Expand full comment

What’s your best way to wake-up those who don’t want to open their eyes?

Please share your most effective wake-up strategies.

The more the awakened, the sooner this nightmare will be over!

The most effective strategy is asking about the person’s opinion on some of these topics:

I start with the 20 million dollar question, while showing videos of baby seizures (money or babies always get attention):


If the person doesn’t want to discuss injections, then food is a good start:

Why is food poisoning legal?

How Rumsfeld forced the approval of Aspartame.

Artificial sweeteners, MSG, PFAS, Glyphosate ... go organic!


Then I’d follow with "Are you opened to see if the actual data matches your opinion?"

Then I start showing some of the shortcomings of the Pharma industry:


Then, show that every single person on the planet should be suing Pfizer and Moderna for deliberately hiding human DNA in their vacicnes, and Pfizer, for injecting an undisclosed carcinogenic monkey virus (SV40) sequence into the cell nucleus of the clueless biohacked, as officially recognized by Health Canada !!!

If he doesn’t like the topic, I’d show this video (all you need is 10 secs in the middle, who doesn’t have 10 seconds for you):


(caveat about the beginning: pot destroys your brain + “Raises Risk of Heart Attack and Stroke”)

9/11: two "planes", yet the third tower (WTC7) imploded, free falling on its footprint like in a controlled demolition. It was out of reach, and all 7 World Trade Center towers needed to be rebuilt, not the closer towers not belonging to World Trade Center... and the “owner” took an insurance policy for the WTC against terrorism, just months before, when no one was taking them … he didn’t show up for work precisely on 9/11 … just as his 2 grown up siblings (they never skipped work before). The inside information about the FUTURE 9/11 event helped masons make trillions by shorting the stock exchange: the records were deleted by the SEC so they wouldn't be prosecuted !!!

Watch amazing short and more evidence here:


Please watch all of this! Your life depends on it, because there's a plan to murder 95% of the global population by 2050… written on the masonic Georgia guide-stones: “Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 … ”:


- J6: The false flag operation of the fake riot was planned, incited and guided by FBI agents, who broke into the Capitol !!! The same mason-plot was copy-pasted to disband the insurrection against the stolen elections in Brazil! All intel agencies (CIA, FBI, NSA) were founded by masons and are run by them for their own nefarious goals.


It's such a mason manual that they organized the same J6 play in Brazil when it was proven that the voting machines owned by mason Soros, were rigged:



All political parties are compromised/infiltrated. For example, Italy supports vax pass and WHO Pandemic Treaty !!! Meloni's Government! People voted her for being against that!


- At least since the 90s, vaccines are weaponized to reduce the population, for example:

1. Adding hCG to infertilize women: lab detected in 30 countries

2. Overpassing the FDA 10 ng limit to human DNA “contamination” by 2000%, thus causing neuro-damage (autism, asperger, tics, dyslexia in 29% of kids, etc.) and childhood cancer epidemic (n.b. leukemia, non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas)

Check soundchoice.org or videos at bottom after this page:

Free 100 redpill movies and documentaries:

(don't miss the 1st one, 10 min at 2x, an amazing tool to start a discussion):


- COVID was designed as a primer for even more lethal COVID haccines:




- You’ll go nowhere and you’ll be happy:


Elon's top secret: EVs cause cancer

Go green with gasoline!


- It's genocide for depopulation:

Depopulation or EXTERMINATION? (finest quotes):

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/depopulation-or-extermination https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/depop-vaccines-no-myth

- You are the carbon they want to exterminate!

1. No one denies there's man-made climate change but scientists disagree on the cause and remedies.

Prehistoric data from ice cores proves that temperature rise precedes carbon release in the atmosphere, not the other way around.


2. There's proof of deliberate geoengineering to increase global temperatures and droughts and decrease albedo by dissolving clouds with satellite Electro-Magnetic Frequencies.


3. Life involves a carbon cycle. A war on carbon is a war on life, causing food scarcity, increase in food prices and famines. Decarbonization is part of a plan to exterminate 95% of the population.

Killing me softly with green songs:


Carbon reparations:


Climate deaths:


- Their main source of power apart from sin-empowered demons? NOT a coincidence that the USA left dollar convertibility to gold in 1971, precisely triggering the exponential government deficit coupled with the trade deficit and inflation.

This is the Achilles’ heel of all nations: masonic and satanic secret societies counterfeit paper money and launder trillions with which they buy Banks, seats in the Federal Reserve (the only private run Central Bank in the world), political careers and parties, puppeticians, listed corporations, media, healthcare corporations and organizations, universities, foundations, judges, etc.:

Confessions of illuminati, David Rockefeller (finest quotes):


Ex illuminati Ronald Bernard: how the world REALLY works


Attali illuminati (“finest” quotes)


The way out of this mess:

1. Create an easy system for real money: private currencies/warrants based on real assets, goods, services, etc. (gold, corn, oil, distance/volume/weight transportation, labor human hour/minute, etc.)

2. Ban legal tender. Let the free markets decide which real-currencies/valuables/warrants they prefer to trade with

3. Ban paper-backed currencies (unlike real-backed ones of point 1.)

4. Enforce a Legal Banking Reserve of 100% of deposits (so banks don't create money based on air) and therefore there's no excuse for a Central Bank, because there would be no risk of bank-runs since all their loans are fully backed with deposits

Anything else you might think of?

Now, are you really ready for this?:

The full PLAN exposed:


16 laws we need to exit Prison Planet


President John Quincy Adams: “Masonry ought forever to be abolished. It is wrong - essentially wrong - a seed of evil, which can never produce any good.”

If you are a mason or know a mason, ask him to ask his 33° master to put in writing and sign it, who is "the great architect" and that he is not Lucifer. If he refuses, then he’ll know who he is really serving, Satan: tell him to get out of masonry NOW. Sooner or later he’ll be required to trample on a cross to get to a higher degree.

Confessions of a former mason (Serge Abad-Gallardo):


Confession of 33rd degree master mason - Masons worship deities/demons


Masonry's Satanic Connection


Masonry's Satanic Doctrine | From Their Own Books


Do Freemasons Worship Lucifer? Evidence They Don't Want You To See


Satanic Ritual Abuse and Secret Societies [1995] [VHS]


Satanic Pedophilia Torture and Blood - Dark Satanic Secrets Revealed




Freemasonry: 100% incompatible with Christ



Expand full comment

Thank you. I am a McGill grad (engineering 1988) and I hate to see this kind of thing happening in Quebec.

Expand full comment

In the medical freedom movement we have relatively few calls to action. Why?

I suggest that everyone who reads this contacts Laval U to register their opposition to this repellent attack on free speech, free thinking & academic freedom.

The site is easy to find of course & there’s a form for ´information’, or we can use the generic email address.

We really have to SPEAK OUT about all the persecution & censorship.

We have to put PUBLIC PRESSURE on these corrupt bureaucrats.

Expand full comment

Yes, it’s called academia.

Expand full comment